The Islamabad High Court has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the Islamabad Police’s report on prioritizing drug eradication in educational institutions, declaring it “not in accordance with the law”. The court’s displeasure stems from the police’s admission that they’re too busy with VIP duties to focus on drug control, which the court views as incompetence.
The Assistant Inspector General (AIG) who compiled the report has been summoned to court in a personal capacity, hinting at potential action against him. The court questions the police’s lack of interest in tackling drug issues in educational institutions, labeling it as incompetence. Furthermore, the court has sought a detailed response from the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) for the next hearing.
This development underscores the court’s push for greater accountability from law enforcement agencies in addressing critical issues like drug control in educational institutions. The case has been adjourned for a month, allowing the police and PEMRA to prepare their responses. The court’s move suggests a determination to ensure that the authorities take their responsibilities seriously and act in accordance with the law.
In Pakistan, the law empowers Sessions Judges and High Court Judges to oversee police actions through the Justice of Peace mechanism. Sections 22-A and 22-B of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) allow these judges to direct police authorities on issues like non-registration of FIRs, transfer of investigations, and addressing police neglect or excesses. This legal framework underscores the court’s authority to intervene in the case and highlights the need for the police to prioritize their duties effectively.
