FIA: A new office order was issued from the Anti-Money Laundering Circle of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), Islamabad, in which all trainees have been instructed to report to Sub-Inspector Kanza Malik. The order clarified that the “pan picture” of all trainees, i.e. the performance report, will be based on his observation.
This seems to be a simple government order, but the matter is not that simple. Here is a “twist” in the story that shows the specific colors of our bureaucratic system. The lady who has been appointed as the supervisor of trainees is herself a trainee sub-inspector! Yes, she is still in the learning phase, her own experience in FIA is negligible, but despite this, she has been made the examiner, supervisor, and decision-maker of other trainees.
Now, perhaps only the top officers of the FIA ​​can understand this strange logic. How could a person who is still undergoing training be put on the shoulders of others to decide their training and professional lives? Was there no experienced officer in the FIA ​​who could do this job? Or is this matter also part of the same “back door” that the bureaucracy had opened in the name of the Prime Minister’s package and under which many undeserving people have been awarded?
Also Read This:
Why British couple who ran education centers in Afghanistan for 18 years arrested?
Not only this, Sub-Inspector Kanza Malik will not only be reviewing the performance of these trainees, but she will also decide who will be in the FIA ​​and who will not. That is, not a novice herself but the master of the fate of others! What a perfect system! Let me tell you about this unique method of the FIA, where relationships and recommendations decide everything more than ability.
This matter is not just an example, but the bitter reality of our government system that is often ignored. When such decisions are made, what can the public expect from an important institution like the FIA? Is it fair that those who need training themselves should make decisions about the future of others? The relevant authorities of the FIA ​​will have to think about whether they believe in merit or whether the “recommendation culture” of the bureaucracy will remain the basis of the future of the institution. Perhaps the FIA’s performance itself will answer this question in the next few days.
